Re: Dateline - Feature on Chronic Pelvic Pain

From: Natalie Shook (airportss@redshift.com)
Mon Jul 3 09:59:16 2000


Anne, I have to agree with you, I think adhesions are not mentioned due to the surgery connection. There would certainly be a great number of questions raised by other patients like you and I who suffer daily with increasing pain. I am sure there would also be more time consuming ( therefore profit reducing) procedures put in place used in surgery if enough of us raise some awareness. I think it is time to get noisy ( dateline etc.) and possibly save other poor souls from unnecessary pain. I think you wrote me previously to this posting.......we live in the same general area. I am still waiting to have my CT scan in a few weeks before they decide what their next plan is. Take care, Natalie

>----- Original Message -----
From: Anne Hayashi <mhaya0902@aol.com> To: Multiple recipients of list ADHESIONS <adhesions@forum.obgyn.net> Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2000 9:34 PM Subject: Dateline - Feature on Chronic Pelvic Pain

> I have just finished watching DATELINE, and one of
> the featured segments concerned a woman who suffered
> chronic pelvic pain and the cause seemed to be related
> to a buried varicose vein in the pelvis. It seems an
> M.D. in Johns Hopkins is able to block some of the
> culprit veins, and has brought about pain relief for
> some women.
> I was disturbed by the fact that Dr. Arnat(sp?)
> listed other pelvic pain causative factors including
> endo., but as usual, no mention of adhesions as a possible
> problem. I would suggest that perhaps DATELINE needs
> to hear from some of us. Research is based on monetary
> return, and I am convinced the amount of money spent on barrier research
> will be dependent on the perception that there is a huge need. If
> varicose veins can get some
> recognition, why is there such hesitancy to feature the
> adhesion issue? Why is this issue always getting bypassed?
> Is it because of the link to surgery? I wonder....
> Anne H.
>


Enter keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords: