Re: Question for Igor-Liver

From: Gina (gina@maine.rr.com)
Mon Nov 8 07:27:45 1999


Igor, I'm interested to know, and feel you might have the answer to this. My enzymes have been elevated for 12 years. I was Dx with hep C based on that. But a liver biopsy done supposedly 5 years after I contracted hep C from a transfusion, showed a normal liver. Could I in fact have a normal liver and still have hep c? Can I have a normal liver and still be a hep c carrier? What other things would cause my enzymes to be elevated at a constant level for 12+ years? Thanks, Gina

At Sun, 7 Nov 1999, Igor Gudymenko wrote: >
>I wrote about all adhesion sufferers as sick liver owners. Yes, I
>did but now I'd like to talk about another thing.
>
>In spring I had 4 complex "liver" blood tests. Each one in a week.
>At first I didn't know the future test result. But since I were
>preparing for spring liver clearance I felt the result won't be
>normal of course. And they said my result was doubtful and it
>would be better to repeat it in a week. I knew in a week they would
>get worse result and would recommed some treatment. But I was calm
>and I even knew approximate future result. In a week I saw the
>figures as had expected. :) Then again - new test - and again new
>and worse result - tree-time high than normal limit (61 instead of
>20 - indirect bile pigmenst rate). They were quite anxious but I
>smiled and said that they would "get" normal result in a week. They
>knew I didn't take any medicine and told me it's impossible. But in
>a week it was 22 and it was only eighth day after the procedure. :)
>
>I told this story to show how flexible our organism is and how high
>can be our intuition and perception of own body if we begin to
>really understand it's signals.
>
>Personally I had many various "liver" blood tests and read about
>many others tests and researches and can say as far as I know
>unfortunatelly there is no reliable method at our times in any
>country to check our liver and gallbladder condition. Enzymes
>level or bile pigments level is not a mark here. Conventional
>medicine uses just indirect methods to evaluate biliary system
>condition if they couldn't find anything during ultrasound, x-rays
>or scanning. So if they have found some drugs in one's blood it
>means his liver and kidney are really "dead" in fact. Bad results
>of liver function tests are just official proof of one's liver
>pickle actually. :(
>It's like with cancer - there is no method which shows us that
>cancer is going to develop. There are just methods which prove
>cancer has developed already.
>
>Best regards,
>Igor Gudymenko


Enter keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords: