Ann,
I was only about 4 mos. along when they diag. a molar pregnancy. I went on
to have 2 more children.
I'm sorry yours turned out like it did.
Kel
-------Original Message-------
From: adhesions@adhesions.org
Date: Sunday, February 17, 2002 02:20:46 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ADHESIONS
Subject: Re: I'm New
Kel
I think I had to have Chemo because it had gone too far - it took about
18 months to diagnose me and I was told my whole womb was enveloped in
the tumours. At the time the C word was never used - I was told
hydatidiform mole or just growths. I should probably have added that I
am in England.
I know that a lot of people who have had a molar pregnancy can go on and
have children afterwards and be perfectly well, I was just unlucky.
Ann
At Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Kelly Murray wrote:
>
>Ann,
>I am comfused on something. I also had a molar
>pregnancy but never had any kind of treatment except taking it out. You ere
>treated with Chemo for it?
>I also had ovarian cysts. I was a DES baby (hormonmes they used to give
>women that later they found out caused a lot of problems) I have had a l t
>of female problems.
>Gosh, was I supposed to be treated for the Molar Pregnancy? Mine was 15
>years ago.
>Kel
>